blob: 397924c686b8e14790469f58c8afc13d78611154 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
|
# Critical Boot System Findings (2025-01-06)
## Summary
We discovered that the ivory.pill file structure is `["ivory" ARVO_CORE]` where the tail is a CELL containing the complete Arvo core, NOT atom 0. However, the lifecycle formula `[2 [0 3] [0 2]]` FAILS when executed on this Arvo core.
## Detailed Findings
### 1. Ivory Pill Structure
**Verified by:** `test/examine_ivory.ml`
```
Tag: ivory
Tail type: CELL
Head type: cell
Tail type: cell
✓ Has slot 2 and 3
```
The ivory.pill file contains:
- Tag: The atom "ivory"
- Tail: **A complete Arvo core (CELL)** - NOT null/atom 0!
### 2. Lifecycle Formula Execution Test
**Tested by:** `test/test_two_stage_boot.ml`
Running `[2 [0 3] [0 2]]` on the Arvo core:
- ✓ Step 1: `*[core [0 3]]` succeeds → returns cell
- ✓ Step 2: `*[core [0 2]]` succeeds → returns cell
- ✗ Step 3: `*[slot3 slot2]` **FAILS with Nock Exit**
### 3. What This Means
The ivory.pill file's Arvo core **cannot be bootstrapped** using the lifecycle formula in our implementation! This leads to two possibilities:
**Possibility A:** The embedded ivory in C Vere is DIFFERENT from ivory.pill
- Embedded might be `["ivory" 0]` or some simpler structure
- ivory.pill file might be for a different use case
**Possibility B:** C Vere's `-B solid.pill` path doesn't use ivory at all
- Your log showed `u3v_life: eve=null` during solid pill boot
- Maybe solid pill boot skips the ivory pill entirely?
- The `u3v_boot_lite()` code in mars.c was COMMENTED OUT!
## Questions to Answer
1. **Does `-B solid.pill` load ivory.pill at all?**
- Need to trace mars.c boot path for `-B` flag
- Check if embedded ivory is even used
2. **What is eve=null in your C Vere log?**
- If eve is null (atom 0), how does `[2 [0 3] [0 2]]` work on it?
- Our test proves it CANNOT work on atom 0!
3. **Is ivory.pill the right file to use?**
- Maybe there's a different pill for bootstrapping?
- Or maybe solid.pill contains everything needed?
## C Vere Test Results
**Test Created**: `vere/pkg/noun/life_test.c`
**Built with**: `zig build life-test`
**Result**:
```
Testing lifecycle formula [2 [0 3] [0 2]] on null
Formula: [2 [0 3] [0 2]]
Subject: 0 (null)
✗ FAILED!
Error: : %exit
This confirms the formula CANNOT work on atom 0!
```
**PROVEN**: The lifecycle formula `[2 [0 3] [0 2]]` **FAILS** on atom 0 in C Vere!
## The Contradiction
Your boot log showed:
```
u3v_boot: processing 10 events
u3v_life: eve=null (atom=yes cell=no)
u3v_life: completed successfully
```
But our C test PROVES this is impossible! The lifecycle formula cannot succeed on null!
## Possible Explanations
1. **"eve=null" doesn't mean the lifecycle formula is called on null**
- Maybe it's just logging what the original `eve` was before processing?
- The actual u3v_life call might receive something else?
2. **The log is from a DIFFERENT u3v_life call**
- Maybe there are TWO separate calls to u3v_life?
- One with ivory pill's core (succeeds)
- One that's never actually executed (logged as null)?
3. **There's special case handling we're missing**
- Maybe C Vere checks for null and skips u3v_life entirely?
- The log might be misleading?
## Next Steps
1. Add MORE detailed logging to C Vere's u3v_life to see:
- Exact eve structure being passed
- Whether formula actually executes
- What the result is
2. Trace where u3v_life is called from during `-B solid.pill` boot
3. Check if there's special handling for null in u3v_boot or mars.c
|